Dave's Western History
Friday, October 21, 2005
  Colony & Empire October 24 Class
Colony & Empire, by William G. Robbins, is a collection of essays on the capitalist transformation of the American West. In his view, ". . . capitalism provides structure, coherent organization, and a unifying theme for discussing change in the American West during the last two centuries." (p. xii) Robbins argues that the story of the development of the West is about how it became integrated into a global economic system during a time of world-wide expansion of corporate capitalism. Hampered by the lack of indigenous capital but blessed with an abundance of natural resources, the West provided an ideal environment for the exploitive capitalist system.

Robbins breaks sharply from the lingering theory of western triumphal exceptionalism that finds high principle and a grand design in the westward movement. At the same time he takes issue with authors of "the innovative social and environmental histories of recent years," who he finds have overlooked the centrality of the issues of power and political relationships in the world of capitalism. He proceeds to analyze the application of capitalist practices to the West and their revolutionary effects on western society.

Robbins is definitely not an apologist for capitalism. He describes its corrosive and destructive impacts on western society as market forces concentrated wealth and power in the hands of a few individuals and corporate organizations while impoverishing small landowners and laborers and damaging the environment. He traces the role of the railroads in opening up the territory and promoting the extractive industries. Mining and lumbering are prime examples of the damaging exploitation of capitalism, which destroys even as it creates in a repetitive cycle of expansion, accumulation, and depression. Eastern and European capitalists controlled the process leaving westerners dependent on outsiders and vulnerable to external forces and events in remote places.

This books fills some gaps in our reading by expanding analysis of the economic forces driving the western experience. The story of the capitalist impact on the environment fits well with Patricia Limerick's theme of "conquest." While she did not use the term "capitalism," she described the story of the west as a "contest for propperty and profit." Robbins' accounts of the mining industry experience presents a sharp contrast between the mining barons of industry and the miners of Roaring Camp. Robbins emphasizes the prominent individual capitalists who made their mark on the west, while Susan Johnson writes history from the bottom up, focussing on the ordinary people in mining camp society. Those miners, of course, were driven by the profit motive and thus were capitalists themselves.
 
Comments:
Dave,

Excellent recall. I hadn't thought to link this book's theme to Limerick. Nicely done. And I agree, no apologist for capitalism here. Do you think he was too forceful? Would his argument have been more successful if he had taken an additive approach?
 
Dave,

I also like your comparison of Robbins's and Limerick's themes of the West as a place of economic conquest. Definitely a theme of both books, but I think Robbins takes capitalism too far as an interpretive schema. Political economy is important to historical understanding but it is not the end all.

Although I agree that Robbins does not see the story of the West as a triumphal story, I think he does see the West as exceptional. He strains to make the West more exceptional than it was in comparison with the South, the other dependent and developing region in the post-Civil War period.
 
Dave, while Robbins touted capitalism as overwhelmingly THE most important construct in understanding the West, I found him SOMEWHAT complimentary to the "innovative" environmental historians (I construed his adjective as complimentary), especially Elliott West (see the last paragraph, p. 21, with a quotation from West from his essay "A Longer, Grimmer but More Interesting Story," in Trails: Toward A New Western History, ed. Limerick). Robbins also highly admires and refers to the noted environmental historian William Cronon several times. Lastly--I'm glad you reminded me of something I criticized unfairly in my blog. Robbins in his Preface admitted that his book was a series of "discrete essays", so I can't fault him for his book seeming disjointed to me. My oversight is the fault of reading a book early and writing a paper later--I forgot this important point.
 
Well, I thought that maybe John, Audrey and I were going to be the pack of wolves that ripped this book to shreds, but reading their comments here, I can see all of us mellowing out a bit. You do a nice job of finding the middle ground of Robbins' work, showing his top-down approach and Limerick's bottom up approach can indeed live side by side (although I'm still not so sure Robbins would see it that way).

Certainly much of what I reacted to in my blog was the obviousness of it all. While I found his details interesting and the stories of places or industry noteworthy, I'm just not sure it all added up to much new news. People have been dogging the "robber barens" for a century and a half. And I'm not sure anyone with two drops of historical knowledge ever really thought that the West was immune to their influence, dealings or interests. Yeah Robbins spells it out for us in ways that maybe hadn't been done before, but using that news metaphor again, I'm just not sure the headline "Eastern Interests Shape the American West!" would sell that many newspapers.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
Comments on readings in History 616

ARCHIVES
September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 /


Powered by Blogger